What is life? Love? Sex? Consciousness?
Happiness? Intellect? I am not asking what their purpose is – that is a
question for many a great philosopher, but I am quite content with why the
world does what it does: -
Rather, my question is, what does any of it
mean?
Are these all matters of the soul, which
can never be explained by the empirical world around us? Are they matters of
the unknown, of which we can theorise about for years to come as we have for
many years past, that we will never progress enough to fully comprehend? Are we
just not there yet?
Life has a purpose, but does it have a
meaning – what makes my life better than that of a rock? Is it any different?
What makes my consciousness, intellect or capability any better, and is any
suggested answer objectively true in all cases
What does it mean to breathe? Can the
creature that has not a heart, and needs no breath, breathe?
What about companionship? I hate to use the
word ‘soulmates’ but heck, what does that even mean? Are we made to be completed
by one individual, and is that the only way to reach our true perfection, or
epitomize our imperfection? So, that must mean that humans are monogamous
creatures…just like animals? (sarcasm is difficult to emphasise, so let me be
clear that my last question had a condescending air about it)
Do problems exist? Can we live without
problems, as conflict is the only way to progress, so surely they must be
instrumental to our being; or not? If we do need problems, then why do we lose
hair over them, and if we can achieve eutopia, then are problems an innate
creation of the psyche?
Are relationships trials, blessings or
both? Do human rights really exist? Who created rights, and what gives us
self-defined rights over other creatures? What constitutes being human, and
could a merciful bird or a fly be more human than a tyrannical, ruthless
humanoid?
Is the goal to life happiness? I always
thought it was, but I have no evidence for it; a happy rapist is no
hypothetical notion I can defend. Could true success lead to one leading a
miserable life (ie a life where one feels in constant misery)?
Can we ever really feel complete? Does the
notion that we can not ever possess enough knowledge haunt us, or empower us?
Each of us will only live for a finite number of hours, and thus can only
achieve a finite number of things – does finiteness strengthen us or render us
insignificant? Are our emotions just one big sinusoidal graph, with everyone
feeling the entire spectrum through their lifetimes, recurring in peaks and troughs?
I believe in objectivity. I believe in love
as an action, rather than a predisposition. I believe in time as the world’s
greatest weapon of mass destruction.
I believe many notions, ideas, emotions,
concepts, are simply misunderstood; I don’t claim to understand them. I believe
accepting we won’t understand everything has its own lessons and virtues. I
also believe it is our greatest weakness, that we blindly follow society’s
definition of concepts as if they are set in stone. Can the stone even exist,
if we remain in oblivious ignorance of it, or arrogant denial?
Universities should be emblems of enlightenment, temples to reason, and sanctuaries of free speech and freedom of thought. They should be houses of tolerance, where tenants of different beliefs and ideologies can find safe haven, and be granted the expression to live as they see fit, whilst developing a greater understanding of integration and culture. Universities should provide a platform where intellectual reasoning allows for opinions to be condoned, or condemned, yet still be expressed and discussed
Alas, though, my understanding of the role of Higher Education institutions was slightly confused after I read Polly Toynbee’s piece on the Guardian.
Ms. Toynbee’s article starts with the unbiased, unassuming condemnation of “sexist eccentricities” of religions; this includes men sitting with other men, and women with other women. This is apparently the misogynistic way that “Muslim speakers” exercise their superiority over women.
Just a quick clarification: although Muslims were pioneers in many fields such as Algebra, Chemistry and Medicine; unfortunately, they were not the inventors of "gender segregation", and cease to be the only group requesting such facilities. The BBC did an interesting piece on segregation within the Haredi Jewish communities a while ago. Moreover, many Universities brag about their international, multicultural student bodies; many students might come from culturally diverse backgrounds, where the inter-gender etiquettes would be viewed as far more conservative than they are in the West. Whilst “segregation” is a practice more commonly used to refer to gender interactions within orthodox faiths, it is a practice that is engrained within society and has been practiced in some shape or form without contention for decades. A war on the right for sexes to sit separately is a war on single sex toilets, single sex schools, single sex university accommodation, single sex hospital wards, single sex sports teams etc. Although some teenage boys might wishfully campaign for changing rooms to become gender neutral, I would still argue that this autonomy is a right that both genders would happily fight for.
So the position I am defending is one of complete freedom AND accessibility to all parties involved, and I feel that UniversitiesUK came with a reasonable compromise. If a large group of people request segregated seating facilities, then as long as all parties are under the same conditions (women or men should not be forced to sit at the back) AND there are facilities for those who stringently refuse to abide by those rules (mixed seating facilities); then I sincerely fail to understand where sexism or misogyny fit in to the argument. If the idea of an event that even has the option of segregating is so abhorrent, then it is perfectly within our capacity not to attend, or to walk out of such events. I’m not particularly fond of satanic cults, so I simply choose not to partake in their activities. It seems highly hypocritical for one to preach about freedom, whilst impinging on the freedom of a large portion of the British community.
Does freedom mean that we have the right to express according to our beliefs, or does it mean we are confined to Polly Toynbee’s interpretation of what sexism and oppression are? If one feels comfortable sitting next to a member of his or her own gender, and we are to deny this concession, then are we suffering from a problem of ‘Gender Apartheid’ or ‘Benevolent Dictatorship’? Al Madinah free school is a very convenient example of gender oppression on Polly's part. I probably wouldn't enrol my daughters in a school if I feel that the seating arrangements would disadvantage them, but I do think this is a petty issue being used as a distraction; al Madinah is facing closure due to a lot of serious issues, and its teachers' dress codes is likely the least of its problems. One Muslim faith school that Polly strategically missed out was the number 1 ranking school in the country.
After years of student activism, I have still not sided with a position on the “No Platform Policy”; however, the notion of banning gender specific seating, or enforcing it for that matter, seems preposterous to me in a country that values Freedom of Expression the way we do in Britain.
I would, in turn, like to call for “secular neutrality” within Higher Education institutions. Although, without fairness, justice and sensitivity towards religious, as well as irreligious beliefs, are we not left with a secularism reminiscent of the tyrannical communist Albania?
The final close of the Hammamet Conference
2013 brings with it a host of ideas, summaries and reflections. Today was a
more emotional day for me personally, as I got to build deeper and more human
connections with people; more personal stories were shared, and more confidence
was mustered to contribute whatever 2 cents I have picked up in my life thus
far.
Today was a solutions oriented day,
complementing yesterday’s joyfully pessimistic ‘issues oriented’ day. The
morning started with a few more sessions on educational reform. In this sector,
I found there to be the largest amount of overlap with issues in the UK. Each
country will have specific issues, and solutions that they need to just get on
par with equivalent global systems, yet Education as a whole needs reform in my
humble opinion
Conclusions from the workshop were as follows: -
1)Involvement of students in
entrepreneurship
2)Narrowing the gap between
graduates and the job market, through better transferrable skills
a.Students don’t see the link
between what they learn, and what they need after university
3)Introducing more creativity and
innovation
4)Bringing professionals to speak
about important issues like taxes, governments, policies etc. to get a more
holistic understanding of the world
5)Better training for teachers,
better development for teachers.
6)Educational reform means we
should think about 21st century learning, instead of copying 20th
century models.
a.Technology advances so fast
that what students learn might become obsolete by the time they enter uni…their
teachers are 15-20 years behind the students. How is education supposed to keep
up? TEACHER DEVELOPMENT
7)Apprenticeships and more
vocational programs
8)National curriculum AND local
flexibility to change the curriculum
a.National curriculum should be strongly
followed in the early years, and then slowly move towards flexibility in the
later years of education
The session was fascinating, but much of it
was too general to be concrete, yet too specific to be applied universally.
Just to recap, the 6 participating countries in this conference are Algeria,
Morocco, Libya, Tunisia, Egypt and the UK. My personal solutions, many of which
I have believed for some time now, and some of which came from today’s
discussion are: -
1)TEACHERS
a.Quality of teachers
i.Make the standard sky
high, subsidise their salaries, give them massive incentives TO teach,
encourage schemes where professionals can spend a year or so teaching and then
go back to their professional jobs, encourage schemes where teachers can spend
a year or so in the private sector and teach from experience with a better
knowledge of what skills students really need
b.Accountability
i.Less focus on exam
results. This causes teachers to become results focuses, rather than
student-welfare focused or student-benefit focused. Compare with Finlands model
which is less exam oriented, more personally catered towards individual needs
yet one of the most successful education models
2)SYSTEMS OF LEARNING
a.What is the purpose of a
classroom? Is it JUST to absorb information, or is it to develop knowledge,
life skills, social skills etc.?
i.MOOCs and KHAN academy
model of learning ONLINE, at home, on videos which can be replayed so each
student can take their own time
ii.Classrooms should have
more time for discussion, analysis, projects, INTERACTION with the teachers.
Why solely be taught economic models that are failing IN THE MIDST of a great
recession? (my solution for increasing creativity and innovation)
3)EXTRA CIRRICULARS
a.Develop a well-rounded
individual. Education is about more than the classroom
i.Encourage integration with
other students/wider society
a.Do this by any means
necessary. If we want an analytical, reflective society, we need people to get
out of Engineer, Lawyer, Doctor ONLY mode
Phew! I’m sure everyone had a blast reading
that summary. This was the session I attended fully, and although we had a
plenary review of the conclusions from other workshops, this is the only one I
will share. Other topics included Active Citizenship, Diversity and Dialogue,
and Trust and Accountability.
The topic of Art and Culture was also
explored, with some fascinating presentations about its importance. The
universality of Art has the power to break social barriers, and lead the way
forward for an integrated youth. It is also a reflection of a society that
wants healthy entertainment, and Egypt was used as a successful model of promoting
Art and Culture even in troubled political times.
A review session, and a few closing remarks
brought the conference to an emotional end. I can genuinely say I have learnt
so much. Most participants outshone me in every discipline imaginable, and it
was truly humbling to be amongst such a gathering. I did have the initial
feeling that my uneducated, inexperienced contributions would be worthless;
however, as the day progressed, I realized that there was an overemphasis on
jargon and listing political institutions and policy hierarchies. As a young,
fresh graduate, I did see things slightly differently, and when I did pluck up
the courage to contribute, it was met with very warm approval.
The last Hammamet report can be read at the
bottom of this document. The main outcome of this conference needs to be
tangible, on the ground actions. Only time will tell what myself, or any of the
other participants do on a practical level. One great initiative announced by
the British Council was a scholarship award for a summer course, and then
ultimately a Masters program at Oxford University for young students from the
North African countries. What I will focus on, is what I can actually take away
from this 4 day rollercoaster
1)Inspiration – inspiration has
never been a problem for me, but the more you expose yourself to active youth,
and accomplished individuals, the more it places that hope in your heart, and
inspiration to truly contribute and make change
2)Read – I have always had an
interest in why the world is as it is, and I have realized that Economics is
really at the heart of it all. So is Politics. So is History. So is…basically,
in my quest to, one day, learn everything about everything, the only choice I
have is to read, and then read some more
3)Confidence – I have found
myself the youngest, least experienced person in many accomplished groups. This
is a great blessing, but I have realized that I am there for a reason. I will
bring a perspective that will be different, and if the perspective is not good,
then I will learn from making a fool of myself…but I will learn, and that is
what is most important
4)Friends – I met some wonderful
people, and I have been promised authentic couscous by atleast 2 Moroccans thus
far. May these friendships last, and may they lead to great collaboration in
the future. (amen)
5)Perspective – at many points in
this conference, my mind was opened, my perspective changed, my paradigms
shifted, and my thinking expanded. This was exciting in itself, because there
is no feeling like being intellectually stimulated by challenging your own
notions
A great experience, and now back to the
hustle and bustle of London life. Hammamet 2014, if God so wills, it would be
an absolute privilege to touch base once more. Until then, goodbye and
goodluck. Godspeed
I have deep respect for translators. Our
headphones can switch between English, French and Arabic in real time, and I
have always wondered how on earth anyone can interpret that quickly.
The conference officially launches! After a
rushed breakfast, and a catch up from the conclusions of last year’s
conference, we get into a session on Youth Perceptions on the Revolutionary
Promise. Chatham House rules dictate that I do not know how far I can go when
mentioning the speakers, so I will refrain entirely, but we were presented with
interesting data from a number of polls and focus groups on the ground.
Many of the trends were expected, and some
were quite surprising. The data is on youth perceptions from April 2012 to
December 2012, so whether this is true or not, this is the general feeling of
the youth from the tests carried out. There was a sense of confusion on
accountability, leadership and electoral vs religious legitimacy. The state
seemed to be creating polarization between ideologies and views. There was a
downright frustration with politics and government representation, and an
increasing need for a third sector or civil sector. The third sector has been
relatively successful in Tunisia, where it is the only space the youth and
women have felt represented.
Perceptions on the ground seemed to be that
state owned and independent media were both biased. There was a surprising
criticism of feminist movements, since they seemed to think that these
movements were not very useful, and they were being constantly spoken about
simply to detract from the biggest issues of inequality in the country. A very
interesting finding was that most Egyptian males had the sense of wanting to
leave their country until the situation improved, whereas the women generally
felt that they needed to stay in the country to help bring their country to
stability. Revolution is seen as entrepreneurial, but although there has been
great frustration, generally people within the country do not expect change
over night, whereas outside the country, perhaps we suffered from this ailment.
A fascinating figure from Gallup World Path
provided a number of points he thought was interesting from his analysis of the
data
1.Structural Economic Reform –
importance of having long term economic policy
2.Addressing mind-set dialogues
3.Jobs are created locally, not
nationally – economically, the data does show that the President can not
realistically be expected to pass policy that will create millions of jobs.
These need to come from localities.
a.Similar arguments in the UK
have greatly interested me
4.Reliance on West to fix
problems – perhaps there are better models, and a recurring example has been
South American politics, which have beenamong the most successful in economic reform
5.Deception of entrepreneurship –
the idea that if you can’t find a job, make a job yourself. The proposal was
that this is not sustainable, and does not provide a solution for unemployment
6.Jobs aren’t created in the same
way as they were in the last 100 years – training, skill set, development needs
to be looked at differently.
a.I did not really follow this
point, but I think the focus was on technology, and skill sets that can be
acquired outside a conventional education system
There is also a difference between an Arab
National, and an Arab Citizen. More and more people want to become citizens,
and share the rights that those bring, outside just owning a passport, and an
identity label.
We then attended smaller workshops. This
always brings with it a dilemma, but I knew that educational reform was my big
passion from amongst the topics. This was a highly interactive session,
focusing solely on the challenges. It was so focused on the challenges, that we
were encouraged to phrase our solutions as challenges aswell, since the solutions
session was to follow the next day.
Speakers talked about the paradigm of
Universities as institutions that manufacture employees, and how this was a
dangerous perception as opposed to viewing them as knowledge banks of research
as well. The lack of promotion of the social sciences was an issue, and
particularly how many of these degrees are quite disenfranchised from the
labour sector. Moreover, there is not enough input from the labour sector about
what skills they actually need from graduates. Lack of humanities and Social
Sciences also leads to an underanalysed society, and a lack of justice and
discipline.
The second speaker spoke (alliteration win)
about vocational training in the UK. Trends in the UK are quite worrying,
seeing as retirees are proportionately more literate than youth, and youth
unemployment and illiteracy is remarkably high. Once more, perceptions were
that the government cannot be solely responsible, and that NGOs and social
entrepreneurs have a large role to play aswell. A trend from the 1980s was the
salary gaps between public and private sector jobs, and so the decrease in
public sector participation also led to a decrease in female participation.
I am quite aware that I cannot simply
summarise everything ever discussed on this poor blog, so I will try to
summarise from now.
I did have to leave early from the session
due to the Friday prayers. My Arabic is superbly patchy, but after a 90 min
long, highly political sermon, we went back for lunch. I tried rabbit for the first
time, and I tried something called kalb. I was quite horrified initially, but
apparently kalb is the Greek word for lamb (I hope!).
The next session analysed two case studies
on diversity, one regarding a conservative politician’s dialogue with the IRA
in Ireland, and the other was on Libyan participation after the revolution. I
realized that I had some personal work to do during the Active Citizenship
session, so I scurried to my room. I realized I was missing a session called
‘New Models of Leadership’ which sounded phenomenal, but I was resolute at
finishing my work.
….I woke up an hour later
So apparently, staying up late at night
writing blogs is a pretty interesting way of exhausting yourself beyond hope.
Well, no harm no foul. I just missed an incredibly fancy dinner at a nice
hotel. But the 10 hour sleep I got afterwards left me to bang this baby out
Day 2 boasts a great array of variety. I
want to say my Arabic and French are improving, but I am becoming increasingly proficient
at merging the two languages like any man’s business! I also make a resolution
not to sleep through any more dinners. Amen